The deceased died on a ranch and left behind her four children, Anthony, Nicolas, Nina and Angela. The deceased`s son-in-law, Charles, served as the deceased`s ranch manager and grazed his cattle on the ranch «free of charge,» in accordance with a written agreement with Decedent during his lifetime. If these conditions are met, the signing of the agreement will prevent all beneficiaries from subsequently challenging the agreement and the agreement will be enforceable like any other written contract. Family comparison agreements are useful in many situations where it is the estate of a loved one. These are used when there is a dispute over the distribution of property to the heirs or if the family agrees that the distribution is different from what the will says. Sometimes the courts let the family enter into these settlement agreements instead of having a trial to settle the disputes. The Texas Court of Appeals found that Anthony and Nicolas did not breach the Family Comparison Agreement under Rule 11 by refusing to execute comparative documents containing a servitude greater than that originally agreed upon by the parties. In other words, the parties cannot violate a family comparison agreement by refusing to do something they did not agree with at all. Under Texas law, the doctrine of family settlement has three fundamental principles: the right of the deceased to make a final decision, the right of beneficiaries to transfer their rights, and the offsetting of those competing rights by requiring agreement on an alternative distribution plan. A family comparison agreement can be used to settle Texas estate disputes, rather than lengthy litigation. One of the most popular applications of family comparison agreements is in situations where someone challenges the will in court. In other words, the will has been submitted to the estate and an heir says that the will is invalid.
The courts prefer this option more because it costs less and the family can all reach an amicable agreement. If you`re in the mess of a contest in your will or your family agrees that the distribution of your loved one`s estate is different, call our company and see if a family comparison agreement is something you might need! Carter`s arguments that the Estate Court does not have the power to authorize a distribution hearing fail. The agreement did not explicitly or practically exclude the independent management of the estate. The court appointed Carter as an independent executor after the sisters signed the agreement. She remains the executor and the estate remains pending, some real estate not being distributed. As heir to the estate and designated beneficiary of his assets under the agreement, Campbell is an interested party in the estate of the estate and may request the distribution of the property in an estate that is independently managed for more than two years. See Tex. Prob.
Code § § 10, 149B. . . .